Tuesday Presser Transcript: The Coordinators 9-6-11

Greg Mattison - DC

Was it weird when you went from Michigan to Notre Dame?
Yeah, it was hard. I can tell you that was hard because it was Michigan you know, I can’t honestly say if I even really knew what a big rivalry that was. I never grew up being a Notre Dame fan. I’m a Lutheran, not a Catholic. When you do that decision based on family, once you’ve made that decision, you kind of go, whoa. But I had a great eight years there. Got to see my family through school and my daughter in collge there, so that made it a really, really good deal.

Assess defensive performance early in the game and how you adjusted later?
The thing that happened is what you kind of worry about happening when you have so many guys that haven’t played a lot of football. You probably got the toughest scenario you could get because it was a very fast paced -- they were switching personnel groups in and out without us really being able to see what they were, and you got defenses that you’re playing for certain personnel groups that you hadn’t against a different group. This young group needs to see everything.
Then it goes down to when a team hurries like that and speeds up the pace, communication is everything, and that’s something we’ve been harping on. With a young group of guys and young linebackers that haven’t played a lot, the communication is the first thing when it all happens it goes. That (first) drive, there was a number things that we weren’t aligned correctly on. And we’re not good enough to do that. We’re not good enough to not be perfect at what we’re doing. Once they came off the side and we settled them down, and we just said, Hey listen. There’s a whole ball game ahead of us. If we get these things corrected we’ll be fine. And then we get the interception, and (we) let them pick back up again.

Hoke wasn’t happy with D-line play.
Neither was I. (nice answer) 

What stuck out to you?
I wouldn’t just single out the defensive line. When we looked at that tape, I knew what I would see. That is not how we want to play defense. Our whole thing is stopping the run. Some of those runs were me I’m calling pressures to try to get after the quarterback and he runs a draw, and we didn’t fit our gaps right. That kind of thing happens. Others they weren’t. We have to be able to stop the run. Anytime a team runs the football on your defense, you can’t have a great day. I think a lot of our fits, our backers fitting, our defensive line knocking them back, playing real physical every snap, all those things have to improve.
The one positive thing in the entire game, though, was we kept the ball inside and in front for the most part. We can’t allow a big play (to become) a homerun play, and that quarterback is a big time quarterback, and that wide receiver is a great wide receiver. So our guys did keep the ball inside and in front, so we could get more guys on the tackles.

Rees vs. Crist?
Well, I think that they’re both very good quarterbacks. The one thing that you have to understand with Rees is he was the starting quarterback the last four games and they won all four. And then he goes in this game in a half and throws for 300-some yards or whatever. So obviously he’s a guy that when he goes in ball games, he does a great job. I think both of them are very talented. You wouldn’t be at a school like Notre dame or Michigan if you didn’t have talent. I think they both have good arms, and they both appear to be very intelligent, and they both have a great wide receiver.

How do you get D-line up to where you want it to be? Will you keep blitzing as much?
It depends if a team is going to throw as much as (WMU) threw. It all depends on what the team does. We won’t sit back and play zone coverage until we have the ability to get a rush with a four-man front. And that comes from technique that comes from a lot of things. It’s not fair to that secondary and it’s not fair to that underneath coverage to let a quarterback like that hold it. I’m not going to say I’m a guy that’s going to blitz every down, but when it dictates it, then I think you have to.

What makes Kovacs so special?
He’s a football player. He’s a Michigan football player. If you had a team of eight of those. I’m not going to say 11. Eight of those. You might sit on a lawn chair and watch the game. That hit that he came on one of the pressures you all saw the picture. It was what you tell and what you coach. Put your face right through his chest. Wrap him up. Eyes up. And he put his helmet right through the football. The thing that people didn’t see on that was he was in the endzone almost the same time as Herron after he had caused a fumble and made the hit. That’s what Michigan defense is about. The same thing happened that was a positive -- Jake Ryan on his tipped (pass). He hit the gournd after he tipped it, (and) he was the first guy down there next to Herron. And that’s what we’ve been talking about. That’s a great sign. Now we gotta keep doing that all the way through a ball game.

Did Herron just happen to be in right place at right time or was he actively doing things right?
He was where he was supposed to be. He executed the defense and good things happen. Thank goodness he’s fast. He never looks like he’s running that fast, but not many people catch him.

Kovacs said he expected to have fewer tackles in this new scheme. But he led the team in tackles on Saturday. At what point is that going to change?
I hope soon. You hit it right on the head. When your safety is making a lot of tackles, that’s not a good thing. It’s a good thing we have Jordan Kovacs, but that’s not a good thing. That happened a number of times if a linebacker were where he was supposed to be, he would have made that tackle. The great news though is Jordan was where he was supposed to be, and I think at times when I’ve watched, he’s been up in there too far, because he’s been trying to make it, and all of a sudden if he misses the tackle, he is gone.

How do you defend Michael Floyd?
You better make sure, number one, that you’re playing with great technique on him. If you don’tin the back end if you don’t play with perfect technique, you’re going to get exposed. I think the second thing is you can’t allow the quarterback all day to throw to him, and I think you have to give him a number of different coverages so he doesn’t know all the time what you’re getting.

Are you going to play one cornerback on him the entire game?
No.

Was Woolfolk on pace for Kovacs’ level of production before he left the game?
He made some very physical hits on those bubble screens, which was great to see. I would love to see him play that game. He needed that. I would have loved to have that thing go four quarters. We needed it. We need every second of playing under pressure that we can get. But I’m glad that we got out of there like we did, and we got a victory, and now we just got to improve more.

Was Woolfolk going full speed in practice today?
Uh huh.

Will you lobby to keep him off special teams?
No. No I won’t. honestly, I will not, special teams play is a huge, huge part in our defense if you saw where we started on defense after a number of those kickoffs. There’s three equal parts to the game, and I’ve seen too many coaches that will say, 'I gotta have that guy.' Okay then put another guy there that doesn’t do as well and you’ll see how fast that ball comes back. We really believe in that here.

What do you and Hoke talk about on headset?
He doesn’t have it on, does he?

But he said he did.
Oh I don’t even know. I tell you what, to be honest, he probably can hear everything I’m saying without the headset on, so I don’t know. Brady is tremendous on the sideline. After that first drive because he’s a great defensive coach. He was over there saying the same things I was saying to those guys. A lot of head coaches might not have reacted like he did. And that pays dividends, because we trust these guys. We believe that they’re going to try as hard as they can. Now we gotta get their tehcnique better, we gotta get a lot of thigns better as coaches, but they’re going to try it, and they’re going to do it. Just like today’s practice. There was a whole bunch of mistakes but you know what? They went hard. And we’ll get those corrected. We just gotta keep on eliminating those mistakes.

Al Borges - OC

How would you assess Denard’s performance?
He managed the offense very well first time out. He had very few errors. A couple of deals, but nothing catastrophic, which is really all you ask for the first time out. He didn’t create the big plays that he’s used to, but our tailbacks did. So as long as somebody does, we’ll be fine. Eventually that part of his game will surface.

Did you get use enough plays on offense you wanted to?
Oh, it wasn’t even close. We ran 39 plays. I mean, we didn’t even scratch the surface. There was so much left in the bag, just the way the game went, which is kind of good. Didn’t even begin to approach our menu.

The one play where Denard scrambled and almost threw a pick, did you use that as a teaching moment?
Of all the plays he had, that was the only play that was a little higher risk. After the fact, he realized he should have probably checked the ball down to the tight end in the flat, but he got a little greedy on that one. But for the most part his decision-making was fairly accurate, other than a play or two.

Is it hard to get a gauge of your offense with only 39 plays?
Yeah, a little bit. But you have 39 to judge, judge and go from there. It was incomplete in so many ways. But it was a win, and we’ll take it, and we’ll go from there. 

This horse isn’t dead yet. Let’s beat it some more. Fitz vs. Shaw?
Both of them showed up. We ended up playing them both, probably Fitz a little more than Shaw, but Shaw did some nice things.

Passes were distributed pretty evenly between receivers against Western. Is that going to be how you do it for the rest of the season?
Not necessarily, no. I think there’s going to be games where you’ll see one guy catch a bunch of balls, and the other guy won’t catch as many, and vice versa. Once you get into the battle, you don’t know how it’s going to go, so you’re never sure exactly who’s going to get it. Now you design certain plays to go to certain guys, but because of the nature of the defense you’re not going to get it to those guys. You always want a degree of distribution, but I’m not obsessed with (the idea that) everybody needs to catch x amount of balls. I could care less about that. What I care about is taking what the defense gives you, and if that means one guy catches ten passes, then so be it.

How did Denard do under center going through his reads?
I thought he did a pretty darn good job. For his first time, his under center play was really good. His shotgun play was that’s kind of his power zone, and that’s why we’re going to use that and do that stuff. His under center play was solid. His mechanics in terms of exchange, tracks and things had a couple of errors on some tracks, but for the most part was pretty reliable.

Only two of Denard’s runs were scrambles. Were you pleased with patience in pocket?
He did a nice job on one scramble particularly. I think he got a first down. He came off one of his receivers a little quick, but for the most part, what you have to understand is you want him to give the pass a chance, but you don’t want to be so obsessed with him always wanting to check the ball down, because he is the best checkdown you could have. So what could be perceived as impatience is sometimes a little more designed than you might think.

Talk about that NFL pass to Grady?
That was the second option. That was a good play. They jumped the slide play, and he threw the ball. That was a nice play by him. He reset his feet, got his hips set, and he hit (Grady) right in stride. That was totally designed. And no scramble there.

Is Barnum back in the lineup for Notre Dame?
Oh yeah. Absolutely.

Talk about going for it on fourth and one. Whose call is it?
It’s my playcall, but it’s (Hoke’s) decision.

Do you coach Denard on his scrambling or do you allow him to improvise?
When the protection breaks down or the pocket gets pushed or for some reason he can’t see, he has to go to an improv mode. All our improv has structure, but Denard does a lot in there that I don’t draw on the board. The one thing you don’t want to do is inhibit a playmaker. A guy that can do some things, you don’t want to make him so that he’s so robotic he’s not doing what he’s capable of doing. Yeah, there’s structure within our improvisation, but his ability to create I always talk about create without doing something stupid. He’s living by the law pretty good, knock on wood.

Would you have gone completely vanilla if there had been a fourth quarter?
Had we scored on the last drive, we probably would have gotten a little more physical. It’s hard to say, but when we get ahead, we like to run the football if we can without being too conservative.

Is the ratio of shotgun vs. under center what you’ll stick to the rest of the season?
No, no, no. The game had no balance to it with regard to that. If we had played a fourth quarter, we would have been right about where we wanted it.

Would Devin Gardner have gotten some snaps?
I don’t know. We’ll see. I couldn’t tell you. That’s up to Brady.

Is Hopkins going to have a role this week?
Oh, absolutely. You bet. He was in the fold big time. Before he couldn’t play, but now that he’s back, he’s going to be a factor. He’s a good player. He brings something to the table. He’s a big back that you like to have.